14 Comments
User's avatar
Becky Cady's avatar

Dave I agree 100% about your Brenna Bird comment.

Expand full comment
Dave Busiek's avatar

Thanks, Becky. A certain justice I’m thinking of would have never allowed this awful ruling.

Expand full comment
Ron Lambert's avatar

You are such a bright man...I totally agree with your comments about Brenna Bird. Totally.

Expand full comment
Kent Zimmerman's avatar

👍

Expand full comment
Bridget Olson's avatar

100% on every word you wrote about Brenna Bird.

Expand full comment
Tom Mott's avatar

What does it mean to:"confront a witness?"

What do you mean by "outrageous?" Show your work.

Expand full comment
Dave Busiek's avatar

Tom, I wrote about witnesses being required to confront their alleged abuser while in the same room. The linked story on that sentence should provide you more information.

The "outrageous" comment is mine - my opinion. I think it's perfectly acceptable to have a child witness testify over video from an adjoining room. I think the court forcing kids to be a few feet away from the person who is alleged to have assaulted them outrageous. You're free to disagree!

Expand full comment
Sharon Goldford's avatar

Dave, thank you. I appreciate awarding praise when it is due. This was a terrible ruling, it’s just a shame it will take so long to fix.

Expand full comment
Dave Busiek's avatar

I tried to think if there’s a faster way, but the majority based its ruling on verbiage in the Iowa constitution, so this likely is the only path.

Expand full comment
Joan Zwagerman's avatar

I was ignorant about all of this. I appreciate having learned about this via your reporting. I’m recently divorced from a spouse who abused alcohol and was emotionally abusive. Once I finally left, I’ve never seen or met with him again. In divorce mediation, I made sure my back was to the door as he walked in. I cannot imagine making children be in the same room as an abuser.

Expand full comment
Dave Busiek's avatar

Joan, I’m sorry to hear that. I cannot imagine. You’ve highlighted exactly what’s wrong with this ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court. I’m glad you’re aware of it now.

Expand full comment
Doug Hansen's avatar

I was surprised and pleased to see our AG promote lawmaking that would address a real issue that hurts Iowans, face it, that's outside her lane. But I still wonder where the poison pill is hidden...

Expand full comment
Dave Busiek's avatar

A skeptic after my own heart!

Expand full comment
Kristie Bell's avatar

I had the same reaction - I wondered what I was missing. Based on many of her actions, preventing cruelty doesn’t seem to be high on her list of priorities for Iowans. I’ll remain cautiously optimistic on this one, and keep one eyebrow raised.

Expand full comment